joit
Active Member
ok. Do you think it would help to use the usergroup element instead of the field element?
One thing I liked about the usergroup element is that it shows the usergroup name instead of the group ID. This way the normal user could see clearly what user group he is in. But if the field element is more secure, I guess I could also use a clac element for converting the group ID to the group name, right?
One thing I liked about the usergroup element is that it shows the usergroup name instead of the group ID. This way the normal user could see clearly what user group he is in. But if the field element is more secure, I guess I could also use a clac element for converting the group ID to the group name, right?