Invisible captcha ?

[henk]

Is it possible to use invisible captcha ?
Now I have selected Nocaptcha, meaning I have to check "I am not a robot".
I need to add some checkboxes to comply with GDPR, so if I could skip this robot check that would be great.
Still need to have spam protection though.

As far as I understood this is now supported by google (but I may be wrong)
I also see there is a file "fabrik-element-captcha-nocaptcha-invisible.php" in the captcha plugin.
This suggest that invisible captcha could be used ?

 

[dangdesigns]

I believe the invisible has to the be set when you set up the site keys also. I'm going to use it on one of my projects, I'll try an post back with more info.

 

[cheesegrits]

I haven't completely finished testing it yet, but I went ahead and merged my invisible Nocaptcha changes:

https://github.com/Fabrik/fabrik/commit/826d2fd4160ce061a1f65170700ba7be92376f5e

So if you do a github update, you should have the new option.

I'll probably add some more settings for the invisible option, like where to tell Google to put the "protected by" logo. At the moment it'll default to bottom right.

-- hugh

 

[trip]

@cheesegrits
Tested this and it does not seem to be working. Get validation failed.
Is this still being worked on?

Side note. The wiki will need updating when adding in the invisible captcha.
http://fabrikar.com/forums/index.php?wiki/captcha-element/#using-nocaptcha

 

[cheesegrits]

It worked for me last time I tested it. I'll try again.

 

[henk]

It works for me after the update on may 8 (see above).

 

[cheesegrits]

@trip - yup, still works for me.

However, I did find a use case that breaks it, which seems to be if you use AJAX validation. Do you use that?

I'm working on trying to figure out what's going on with that. Looks like the Google recaptcha code is thinking that the AJAX validation call is the form submit, and tries to make a non-existent callback / promise.

-- hugh

 

[trip]

@cheesegrits we are using ajax validation, so yes this might be the issue. It would be good to fast track this particular change, using the bulky checkbox is so 80's and I think presenting an invisible version works well.
We have been using our own honeypot which Rob suggested many moons ago, but it looks like the last few months this is also proving to be a little problematic.
An update when you have it done would be appreciated.
M